Letting go, and how
and why I’m trying to do so.
I’ve been reading some very interesting things, and having
some very deep thoughts this week. It’s all a bit existential but I reckon it’s
for the best. The question I’ve been asking myself, every time I read a tweet
or check a status update, is ‘Why?’ And if I can’t answer that question, it’s
probably not going to enhance my life, and I should just switch off. Because,
as Cecil Day-Lewis said, sometimes ‘selfhood begins with a walking away’.
The idea of asking why I’m doing whatever it is I’m doing is
one that really resonates with me. I
have a tendency towards compulsiveness, and before I read the introduction to
Rheingold’s book Netsmart: how to thrive
online I was compulsively checking several feeds, first thing in the
morning, and thereafter, every few hours throughout the day, and last thing at
night. I hardly read actual books any
more, which is worrying. The way I relate to people and the format of my social
affiliations – all of this is out of whack. As Marche describes it, my
friendship circles are ‘broader but shallower’ (2012:9). And I realised that
checking every single update and knowing all the news first wasn’t making me
any happier. In fact, it was taking away
large amounts of time that I could’ve been spending with real human beings who
like me. I was out of balance. I’m still
out of balance, but I’m trying to fix that now.
I want to be enriched without drowning in ‘torrents of misinformation,
disinformation, advertising, spam, porn, noise and trivia’ (2012:5) although,
to be fair, I’ve managed to avoid the porn. I want to be a media connoisseur,
sampling and selecting an elegant sufficiency, instead of a glutton consuming
everything I come across. I know that this
will involve a little scepticism and a lot of discernment, and that it will
take time. And I agree that these skills
should be taught in schools. I don’t
understand why this isn’t the case already: we need to make sure that future
generations are enriched by the online world, not anaesthetised.
A lot of what Rheingold said reminded me of Heidegger’s idea
of standing reserve: Rheingold’s advice to assess the ‘activity of the moment’
in terms of whether it ‘is really as significant as what is happening in the
rest of my life’ makes so much sense (2012:8) because people are more important
and worthwhile than feeds, and it’s easy to forget that. I left my phone completely alone this
weekend, went out and met people and had a blast. And I did not post a single thing about how
much fun I was having, because, quite simply, I was having too much fun. I felt so positive about life. Even South
Africa seemed like a nicer place (it certainly has wonderful aspects to it that
are easy to miss if all you read is the news, and you don’t get out there and
explore).
Admittedly, talking to people is always more challenging
than texting, especially as I have a major case of foot-in-mouth disease, but
it’s worth the risk. You can’t have
meaningful and happy relationships without that risk. You need to let people
see the real you; not the edited and mediated version of you that you choose to
present online.
However, I have enormous belief in the positive power of
online collaboration. Last year, I took
part in a massive project to upload electronic copies of everything Charles
Dickens ever wrote. Hundreds of
thousands of volunteers pitched in, just for the sake of being part of
something awesome. I’m glad I took the time
to do it, and I think this kind of crowd-sourcing is fantastic.
From a more professional point of view, I certainly have
fallen into the ‘always available’ trap.
I’ve built a reputation for always getting things done straight away and
well before deadline. I’m fiercely proud
of that reputation, but it definitely does create a vicious circle, or ‘cycle
of responsiveness’ (Perlow 2012:8): a lot of my editing clients think that
giving me a 24- or 48-hour deadline on a job is totally okay. I actually turned a job down just last week,
for the first time, because if I’d accepted it I would have had to work through
the weekend. I’m so glad I told them
‘no’, although it was fiendishly hard to do at the time. Maybe they’ll be less likely to do it again,
and man – I had such a good weekend.
Totally worth it. And it really is the first actual weekend I’ve had
this semester.
One last thing: although I’m trying to redress the imbalance
between my real and virtual worlds, I don’t want it to sound like I’m not a fan
of the electronic realm. I’ve met some
fantastic people there, with whom I share deep and real connections, and my
life would have been significantly poorer – and lonelier – had I not done so.
Sarah, your existential pondering also really made me think about my own investedness in always being "on", and "on" time, and doing more and more.
ReplyDeleteThis is madness surely? Rheingold is really clever when he says we should consider to try and live "mindfully" with our new technologies!